Collaborations and Sticky Situations
Co-writing can be a truly freeing experience. In a good co-writing relationship, we can expect to come upon ideas together we wouldn’t have normally thought of on our own, broaden our lyrical and musical scopes, finish songs faster much less finish them at all, and just plain have a good time. Even co-writing relationships that last only a short time have monumental benefits for each writer. It’s not unusual for two writers to come together and without a previous meeting or relationship, write a truly fantastic song.
As with all working relationships, co-writing requires some special skills on both sides. At some point both parties will need to be flexible, to trust the other’s judgment, and keep a commitment to work on the song until it satisfies both writing partners. Sometimes the pacing of each writer is different, one writer accustomed to tossing around ideas quickly, and another more comfortable with processing an idea internally before offering it up for consideration. There’s no wrong way to write if it yields good material, and so it is with co-writing. What works for one pair may not work at all for another.
But what about those situations in which the relationship goes sour, or disappears into thin air when there is half a song in the balance? Who owns what? What if one party wants to demo the song and another doesn’t? Who pays for the demo? What if you’re not proud of the song, but your co-writer is playing it everywhere for everyone with your name plastered all over it?
There may not be rules, but there are some good guidelines of conduct we can apply to these situations. The first guideline is to sit down with your co-writer before beginning to write and discuss how you both wish to divide up the song. Whether you’re a lyricist and don’t write any music, or both you and your co-writer are both chipping away at lyric and music ideas at the same time, a very common split is 50/50. That means that even if you’re writing with an artist, and that artist simply says ‘yes, I like that’ or ‘no I don’t like that,’ the split is still 50/50. The reasoning here is that over time, all of us are more or less helpful in coming up with song material during a writing session. What goes around comes around, and to count words or count notes that belong to each writer just complicates things and adds unnecessary stress to the relationship.
It’s not uncommon for the writers to lose steam mid-way through the song, and the tune sits unfinished for months on end. If the idea is really as good as you thought it was when you started it, you’ll know after hearing it again for the first time. If you’re bound and determined to finish a tune and your cowriter is MIA, you don’t have to scrap the tune. What I’ve done in the past is let my co-writer know through an email and a phone message that I’d like to finish the tune, and to please let me know when is convenient to get together. If I get no response, I leave another message and email, this time with a deadline after which I will finish the song on my own if he/she doesn’t respond. Now, if we’ve signed a split sheet agreeing to a 50/50 split, then that agreement still stands. If no agreement was signed, I let my co-writer know that I plan on finishing the song as 50/50 (if I intend on keeping what we wrote together). If I want to scratch the whole tune, keeping the title I brought into the co-writing session, for example, then I let my co-writer know that is what I intend to do. His/her lack of communication is an acceptance of the terms.
When it comes to demoing, it gets a little tricky. I don’t expect a co-writer to chip in 50% of the cost of the demo for a song he/she doesn’t believe in. So if I feel very strongly that the tune is worth recording, I’ve got to eat those initial costs myself. Certainly, if the song gets placed and makes money, I can bring half those initial costs up with my co-writer again. But one word of warning – if your co-writer isn’t totally psyched with the song, consider why. Is the song really as strong as you think it is? Is there is a disconnect in how you view the direction of the lyric or the music, and you need to record a simple rough piano/vocal or guitar/vocal to get your thoughts across clearly? It can sometimes be easy to ride on the excitement of a collaboration and start to believe a song is better than it actually is. Nothing heals this better than time. Give it a few months, and see how the song hits you as you listen more objectively. If either writer is bound by a publishing contract, then the publisher should be involved in the decision of whether to demo the song. After all, if the publisher believes in the song enough to invest a little demo money, it suggests the publisher believes the song is worth pitching. If the publisher doesn’t think the song is marketable, then the writers may decide it’s a better idea to go back to the writing room and work up a song everyone can stand behind.
Finally, if your co-writer thinks the world of the tune you wrote together but you’re on the fence, don’t sweat it. If you’re not keen on contributing to demo costs, suggest a simple piano/vocal demo or guitar/vocal demo instead. Explain that you like to write several songs before taking them all into consideration for which are the top tunes to be demoed. If the writer is so pleased with the tune that he/she is constantly playing it for folks, don’t sweat that either. If you’ve got stronger songs, that reputation will precede you, so you simply stay the course striving for better tunes, a bigger network, and more opportunities. Other songwriters understand we are the sum of our body of work, not just one song. One song can as easily be chalked up to serendipity as it can be the result of consistent, hard work. I’m thankful for those songs that fall out without much effort, but grateful for those that come from my desire to create a specific and intentional experience.
Happy writing,
Andrea Stolpe


